Some interesting news in yesterday's Telegraph regarding the decision by Encyclopaedia Britannica to finally allow readers to edit it's online content. Is the resource a Wikipedia-wannabe or just improving its "symbiotic relationship between editor and reader"?
At the same time, the RNA Biology journal is apparently now requiring academics to post their research findings on Wikipedia. "Modification activity", as Terry Wassall puts it, is obviously a concern but it certainly supports the idea that distinctions between subscription and non-subscription resources are blurring.
Mentoring MLIS Students on the Job Market: How to make mentorship work for
you and your mentees
-
Editor’s note: We welcome a guest blog post from Lexi Kadis, Teaching and
Learning Librarian at the University of Maryland Libraries. I was in a
state of...
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment