Some interesting news in yesterday's Telegraph regarding the decision by Encyclopaedia Britannica to finally allow readers to edit it's online content. Is the resource a Wikipedia-wannabe or just improving its "symbiotic relationship between editor and reader"?
At the same time, the RNA Biology journal is apparently now requiring academics to post their research findings on Wikipedia. "Modification activity", as Terry Wassall puts it, is obviously a concern but it certainly supports the idea that distinctions between subscription and non-subscription resources are blurring.
Laid Off, Again
-
On July 29th, I was enjoying a week of vacation, spending time with my
spouse’s family in South Dakota. I got an out-of-the-blue text message
asking me t...
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment